Tensions Flare as Wyndham's Future Vision Sparks Heated Debate and Concerns
In a tumultuous council meeting on Tuesday night, the Wyndham 2040 Plan, outlining the future vision of the Wyndham municipality, was passed despite staunch opposition from two council members and vocal criticism from the public gallery. The contentious meeting saw Wyndham Mayor Susan McIntyre struggling to maintain order, repeatedly calling for decorum. In the end, the Wyndham Plan was approved with a majority vote.
The Wyndham 2040 Plan aims to transform the municipality into a thriving urban centre, aligning with the goals set out in the Wyndham 2040 Community Vision. It envisions a population of 500,000 residents by 2040, necessitating a shift from a collection of suburban neighbourhoods to a unified urban area with a central focus on a City Heart and National Employment and Innovation Cluster.
One of the most controversial aspects of the plan was its reference to planning concepts like “20-minute cities” and “Smart Cities.” Some residents expressed concerns, claiming that these ideas could be tools for mass surveillance and impose restrictions on personal freedom and movement. However, the plan’s consultation report emphasized that it does not intend to restrict residents’ movements, and council officers reiterated this point despite public scepticism.
Watch the video
The meeting chamber echoed with public dissent as residents passionately voiced their objections from the gallery. Some shouted, “You don’t listen to us!” and “The residents don’t want this!” Many residents felt ignored, and they alleged that the Council was disregarding their concerns.
Opposing the plan, Councilor Mia Shaw raised concerns about its financial implications, stating, “I don’t believe we can afford this.” She pointed out that the document lacked clarity on the potential costs to be borne by the council and ratepayers, leading to uncertainty about the plan’s feasibility. Councilor Heather Marcus joined Shaw in opposing the plan and called for further consultation. Their stance received applause from the gallery, which felt that their voices had not been adequately heard.
Despite the fervent opposition, the Wyndham City Action Group accused the Council of neglecting residents’ opinions and pushing through its agenda without heeding their concerns. The passage of the Wyndham 2040 Plan has, therefore, sparked a deep divide between the Council and a segment of the Wyndham community, setting the stage for continued debates and discussions about the municipality’s future.
